Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Khilafah

UUD / AL-QADLA (Badan peradilan) §75-95

Pasal 77: Jenis-jenis Badan peradilan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Khilafah, berdasarkan metode kenabian:

Pasal 77: Para Qadli terbagi dalam tiga golongan:

  •     1. Qadli (biasa), yaitu Qadli yang berwenang menyelesaikan perselisihan antar masyarakat dalam urusan muamalat dan uqubat.
  •    2. Al-Muhtasib, Qadli yang berwenang menyelesaikan pelanggaran-pelanggaran yang merugikan hak-hak jama’ah/masyarakat.
  •       3. Qadli Madzalim, berwenang mengatasi perselisihan yang terjadi antara rakyat dengan negara.

 

 

Article 77: The Judges are of three types: One is the Judge (Qadi), and he undertakes settling the disputes between people over transactions and penal codes. The second is the Muhtasib, who undertakes the settling of any breach of law that may harm the rights of the community. The third is the judge of the Court of Injustices (Madhalim), who undertakes the settling of disputes between the people and the State.

This article explains the types of judiciary. The evidence about the judge that settles disputes between people is derived from the actions of the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم and from his appointment of Mu’adh b. Jabal (ra) over an area of Yemen.

As for the evidence for the judiciary regarding the settling of disputes which endanger the rights of the community, where the judge is known as the Muhtasib, this is confirmed by the action and words of the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم, for he said

«لَيْسَ مِنَّا مَنْ غَشَّ»

“He who decives has nothing to do with us” (reported by Ahmad and Ibn Maja from Abu Hurayrah). He used to confront the cheaters and punish them. Qays b. Abi Gharzah Al-Kanani reported

كنا نبتاع الأوساق في المدينة ونسمي أنفسنا السماسرة، فخرج علينا رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم فسمانا باسم أحسنمن اسمناقال صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم: «يَا مَعْشَرَ التُّجَّارِ، إِنَّ الْبَيْعَ يَحْضُرُهُ اللَّغْوُ وَالْحَلْفُ، فَشُوبُوهُ بِالصَّدَقَةِ»

We used to trade in the markest of Al-Madinah and we used to call ourselves as-Samasirah (brokers), so the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم came out to us and gave us a better name. He صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم said:O company of merchants, unprofitable speech and swearing takes place in business dealings, so mix it with Sadaqah (alms)(reported by the authors of the Sunan and Al-Hakim who authenticated it, and Al-Tirmidhi said it is Hasan Sahih). And it is narrated that Al-Bara’ b. ‘Azib and Zayd b. Arqam were partners, so they both bought some silver with money on the spot and by credit. This news reached the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم so he صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم ordered

«أَنَّ مَا كَانَ بِنَقْدٍ فَأَجِيزُوهُ، وَمَا كَانَ بِنَسِيئَةٍ فَرُدُّوهُ»

“What was by (on the spot) money is permitted, and what was on credit must be rejected”

(reported by Ahmad from Al-Minhal). All of this is the judiciary of Hisbah.

Calling the judiciary that settles the disputes that may harm the right of the community as Hisbah is in fact a technical term referring to a specific task carried out in the Islamic State, which is the monitoring of the traders and skilled workers in order to prevent them from cheating in their trade, work, or products, forcing them to use measurements and scales and preventing anything else that may harm the community. These are the very types of actions that the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم demonstrated, ordered to be observed, and undertook in settling their issues, as is clear from the narration Al-Bara’ b. ‘Azib, where he صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم prevented both parties from selling silver by credit. Therefore, the evidence about the Hisbah isfrom the Sunnah. In the same manner, these evidences include that the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلمappointed Sa‘id b. Al-‘As over the Makkan market after it had been conquered as is mentioned in Al-Tabaqat of Ibn Sa’d, and in Al-Isti’ab of Ibn Abdul Birr. And Umar Bin Al-Khattab (ra) appointed Al-Shifa, a woman from his clan, as a market judge (inspector), in other words, a judge of Hisbah, as he also appointed ‘Abd Allah b. Utbah over the market of Madinah, as reported by Malik in Al-Muwatta and Al-Shafi’i in his Musnad. He personally used to also deal with the judiciary of the Hisbah, and would go around the markets just like the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم used to do. The Khulafaa’ went on carrying out the Hisbah until when Al-Mahdi came he established a special department for the Hisbah, making it a part of the institutions of the judiciary. At the time of Al-Rashid, the Muhtasib (judge of Hisbah) wouldgo around the markets, checking the weights and measures for any cheating, and to look into the traders’ transactions.

The proof for the judiciary that is called the Judge of the Court of Injustices (Madhalim) is the action of the Messenger   having allowed him to retaliate from the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم himself. Al-Bayhaqi narrated in Alsunan Alkubra through Abi Saeed Alkhudari who said:

بينما رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم يقسم شيئا أقبل رجل فأكبَّ عليه صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم فطعنه رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم بعُرجون "أي عِذْق من نخل" كان معه صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم فجرح الرجلَ، فقال له الرسول صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم «تعالَ فاستَقِدْ»، فقال بل عفوت يا رسول الله.

“While the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم was dividing something, a man approached him and tried to hastily take a portion from the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم. He صلى اللهعليه وآله وسلمstabbed him with a date tree stalk which was with him, thereby wounding the man. The Messenger   said to the man: “Come and retaliate.” The man replied: I have forgiven O Messenger of Allah.”. This is a case between the head of the state (the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم ) and one of the citizens, and additionally he صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم said

«فَمَنْ كُنتُ أصبتُ مِن عِرضه، أو مِن شَعره، أو من بَشَرِه، أو مِن ماله شيئاً، هذا عِرض محمد وشعرُه، وبشرُه، ومالُه فليَقُمْ فليَقتصَّ»

“Whoever I took property from, here is my property; let him take from it, and whosever back I whipped, here is my back; take recompense from it.” reported by Abu Ya’la from Al-Fadl Bin ‘Abbas. Al-Haythami said that ‘Ata b. Muslim who is in the chain of Abu Ya’la has been considered trustworthy by Ibn Hibban and others, whereas others have weakened him, and the rest of the narrators are trustworthy. In a narration by Tabarani in al-Mu’jam Al-awst by al-Fadhl bin al-Abbas narrated that the Prophet صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم said,

«فمَنْ كنتُ جلدتُ لهُ ظهراً فهذا ظهري فليَسْتَقِدْ منه، ومَنْ كنتُ شتمتُ لهُ عِرضاً فهذا عِرضي فليَسْتَقِدْ منه، ومن كنتُ أخذتُ لهُ مالاً، فهذا مالي فلْيَسْتَقِدْ منه»

Whoever I had whipped his back here is my back, let him retaliate! Whoever I had cursed his honor, here is my honor let him curse it! Whoever I had taken some money from him here is my money, let him take from it. This is nothing other than the judiciary of the injustices (Madhalim), because it is encompassed by the definition of the judiciary of injustices (Madhalim), which is the investigation into what occurred between the people and the Khalifah. Therefore, the evidence for the judiciary of injustices (Madhalim) is the actions and words of the Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم. However, he صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم did not make a judge specific to the injustices (Madhalim) alone for all the areas of the State, and the Khulafaa’ after him proceeded in the same manner, in that they used to deal with the injustices (Madhalim) as occurred with ‘Ali Bin Abi Talib (ra) – but he did not make it during a specific time or with a particular style, rather the injustice (Madhlamah) would be looked into as it occurred, and so it was part of the overall actions. The situation remained the same until the days of ‘Abd Al-Malik b. Marwan, who was the first Khalifah to deal with the injustices (Madhalim) separately at a specific time with a particular style, so he used to designate a specific day, and would look into the injustices, and subsequently if anything was difficult for him he would pass it to his judge who would rule upon it. After that, built upon this system, the Khalifah would appoint a delegate who would look into the injustices raised by the people, and the Court of Injustices (Madhalim) became a specific apparatus, and used to be called “Dar Al-‘Adl” (the House of Justice). This is permitted from the angle of appointing a judge who is specific for it, since it is permitted for the Khalifah to appoint someone as a delegate to undertake his work in all the mandatory powers that he has and it is permitted from the angle of specifying a particular time, and style, since it is from the permitted issues.

Beberapa pasal UUD

Undang Dasar Negara Khilafah

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Khilafah, berdasarkan metode kenabian:

Pasal 28: Kedudukan Khalifah

Pasal 28: Tidak seorang pun berhak menjadi Khalifah kecuali setelah diangkat oleh kaum Muslim. Dan tidak seorang pun memiliki wewenang jabatan Khilafah, kecuali jika telah sempurna aqadnya berdasarkan hukum syara’, sebagaimana halnya pelaksanaan aqad-aqad lainnya di dalam Islam. Selengkapnya
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Khilafah, berdasarkan metode kenabian:

Pasal 157: Negara memastikan sirkulasi kekayaan antara rakyat

Pasal 157: Negara selalu berusaha memutar harta di antara rakyat, dan mencegah adanya peredaran harta pada kelompok tertentu. Selengkapnya
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Khilafah, berdasarkan metode kenabian:

Pasal 80: Putusan Pengadilan

Pasal 80: Sidang pengadilan tidak boleh terbentuk atas lebih dari satu Qadli yang berwenang memutuskan perkara. Seorang Qadli boleh dibantu oleh satu atau lebih Qadli lain, tetapi mereka tidak mempunyai wewenang menjatuhkan vonis. Wewenang mereka hanya bermusyawarah dan mengemukakan pendapat. Dan pendapat mereka tidak memaksa Qadli untuk menerimanya. Selengkapnya
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Khilafah, berdasarkan metode kenabian:

Pasal 84: Al-Muhtasib

Pasal 84: Al-Muhtasib adalah Qadli yang memeriksa perkara-perkara yang menyangkut hak-hak masyarakat secara umum, dan di dalamnya tidak perlu terdapat penuntut, dengan syarat tidak termasuk perkara hudud dan jinayat. Selengkapnya
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Khilafah, berdasarkan metode kenabian:

Pasal 62: Jihad

Pasal 61: Jihad adalah kewajiban bagi seluruh kaum Muslim dan pelatihan militer bersifat wajib. Setiap laki-laki muslim yang telah berusia 15 tahun diharuskan mengikuti pelatihan militer, sebagai persiapan untuk jihad. Adapun rekrutmen anggota pasukan reguler merupakan fardhu kifayah. Selengkapnya
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Khilafah, berdasarkan metode kenabian:

Pasal 47: Batas-batas kekuasaan Mu’awin Tafwidl

Pasal 47: Apabila Mu’awin Tafwidl telah mengatur suatu urusan, lalu disetujui Khalifah, maka dia dapat melaksanakannya sesuai persetujuan Khalifah, tanpa mengurangi atau menambahnya. Jika Khalifah menarik kembali persetujuannya, dan Mu’awin menolak mengembalikan apa yang telah diputuskan, maka dalam hal ini perlu dilihat; jika masih dalam rangka pelaksanaan hukum sesuai dengan perintahnya atau… Selengkapnya
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Khilafah, berdasarkan metode kenabian:

Pasal 76: Hakim Agung

Pasal 76: Khalifah mengangkat Qadli Qudlat yang berasal dari kalangan laki-laki, baligh, merdeka, muslim, berakal, adil dan faqih. Jika Khalifah memberinya wewenang untuk mengangkat dan memberhentikan Qadli Mazhalim, maka Qadhi Qudhat wajib seorang mujtahid. Qadli Qudlat memiliki wewenang mengangkat para Qadli, memberi peringatan dan memberhentikan mereka dari jabatannya, sesuai dengan peraturan… Selengkapnya